Draft 2004, Defensive Backs
This is the first of a (short) series towards our final Big Board of Value.� Since the Steeler secondary has been the root of much evil for the past two seasons, we�ll begin there.� To be sure, the FO already has taken some measures to address this: selecting upside speed players Troy Polamalu and Ike Taylor in the 2003 draft and, more recently, achieving addition by subtracting both Dewayne Washington and Brent Alexander.� Still, considerable need remains; now, by way of introduction to that:
- CB:� It all depends on Ike.� Reportedly Taylor is having a tremendous off-season; if so, the PS may already have their lockdown CB.� Otherwise, while Townsend played good ball in a starting role last season, considering the wave of big WR entering the league, DT is best cast as a 3rd CB.� That�s not all bad; after all, in the nickel co-base, your 3rd corner has to be equivalent to your 3rd LB, or in the Steelers� case, their 3rd D-lineman.� Townsend may approach that status; still, there�s plenty of room between Ike and DT, either way.� Future-forward, well, Townsend has two years to play; for purposes of discussion, we�ll say Chad Scott has one (or, for rook pool purposes, none).
- In general, the Steeler backups are small CB: �Fair, Iwuoma and maybe BJ Tucker or Nashville Dyer.� The PS has the numbers but no proven quality.
- FS:� The Steelers have no FS at all.� Polamalu is a SS; Logan was a SS too and, if Hope were a FS then Logan would not have been brought back to start next season at that spot.� While all three are useful players, and Polamalu may become something more, none have real single high capability, or the frame to cover TE.�
- In the D-Side Overview published last January, it was purported that, so long as the Steeler Front 7 is constructed in the Blitzburgh mode, the Rush 4, Cover 2 scheme cobbled up for 2003 is a no-go.� That strongly suggests some secondary template with a division by 3 such as man out, single high or Cover 3.� Either would allow those (many) SS to interchange with the LB, especially Porter and Bell, getting pressure on opposing QB that the D-line isn�t likely to produce.� Off that, a frame-worthy, single high FS with sideline-to-sideline speed is as great a need as CB, maybe greater.
Still, you get what you can but just as a means to establish some parameters, consider this survey, from NFL. com�s Draft History.�
By the numbers, CB and FS selected from 1998-2003:
CB |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Average/Avatar |
On
the board at 1.11 |
3rd |
3rd |
1st |
1st |
2nd |
2nd |
SecondMarcus Trufant |
1st
round total |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Four |
On
the board @ 44th selection |
7th |
7th |
4th |
5th |
5th |
8th |
SixthPatrick Surtain |
Total
thru 2nd |
9 |
7 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
Eight |
On
the board @ 75th selection |
10th |
10th |
10th |
11th |
10th |
9th |
TenthWilliam Peterson |
Total
thru 3rd |
12 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
11 |
Eleven,
twelve. |
On
the board @ 106th selection |
13th |
13th |
15th |
15th |
15th |
13th |
FourteenthBrian Williams |
Looks like four per round, on average.� A couple of things worth noting:
- 1998 was the year of the CB, especially in the 2nd round where Artell Hawkins, Patrick Surtain, Brain Kelly and Samari Rolle were drafted 43, 44, 45, and 46; Charles Woodson, Duane Starks and Antoine Winfield were in that class too.� A similar number were drafted in 1999 but past Bailey and McAlister (top 10), the quality was well down.
- 2003
was the year of the big hybrid CB/S with nine DB drafted in a run
beginning at 28 (Andre Woolfolk) and continuing through Drayton Florence
(45).� However, it�s worth noting
though that the 2003 draft was weak in both OT and WR.� Leaving the former, where this class is
little better, the WR group is much, much stronger.� We can expect 6-7 WR to be taken in the
1st round; that alone should push the CB numbers back towards
average.�
And FS:
FS |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Average/Avatar |
On
the board at 1.11 |
1st |
1st |
1st |
1st |
2nd |
1st |
FirstRoy Williams |
1st
round total |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
One |
On
the board @ 44th selection |
2nd |
1st |
4th |
3rd |
4th |
3rd |
ThirdBrain Dawkins Darren Sharper |
Total
thru 2nd |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
Three |
On
the board @ 75th selection |
3rd |
3rd |
5th |
4th |
5th |
4th |
FourthNone noteworthy |
Total
thru 3rd |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
Three,
four |
On
the board @ 106th selection |
4th |
4th |
5th |
5th |
5th |
6th |
FifthLance Schulters |
Both positions, transposed to the class of 2004:
|
CB |
FS |
Remarks
|
BPA |
Value
cluster |
Could
be on the board at 1.11 |
DeAngelo HallDunta
Robinson |
Sean Taylor |
Pass
on Robinson |
Kellen
Winslow, TE Will Smith, OLBPhil
Rivers, QB |
WR,
DE. |
In
the gap |
Will
Poole |
|
|
|
RT |
4th
to 8th CB 44th overall 2nd
to 4th FS |
Ahmad
Carroll Kevin SmithDerrick StraitJoey
Thomas? Chris
Gamble Jeremy
LeSueur |
Derrick
Strait? Sean JonesMatt
Ware |
Of
those DB, Sean Jones is value #1, except as Strait may be a 2/1 type player. |
Ben Watson, TEKelly
Butler, RT |
OG/OC |
In
the gap |
Any
of the above |
Matt
Ware |
Ware
is a trade down value |
|
|
9th
to 11th CB 75th overall 3rd
to 5th FS |
One
above R. Colclough
Greg Brooks |
Matt WareS.
Schweigart |
Past
Carroll and Smith above, I see little difference between CB 6 and CB 9. |
Derrick
Hamilton,
WR |
DT,
CB |
In
the gap |
Any
below |
|
|
|
|
13th
to 15th CB 106th overall 4th
to 6th FS |
Marcel Almond
Rich
Gardner Roc
Alexander Bruce
Thornton (K.
Millbrook) (A.
Parker) |
S. Schweigart J.
Shivers M.
Williams |
|
Tim
Anderson, DT |
OG/OT
types. |
Remarks:
First day CB suspects from this class might be characterized as:
- The swift:� Hall, Robinson and Carroll ran 4.34 at the Combine; Hall and Carroll jumped out of the gym; all are strong enough to play.� While some regard Dunta Robinson as #1 at the position, IMO that rank belongs to DeAngelo Hall.� Hall is 1.11 worthy, although he may not be BPA at that spot.� I don�t see that value with Robinson, although I do believe he�ll be a top 20 pick.� Ahmad Carroll is about as athletic as Hall but just a bit smaller.� Pre-Combine, he was considered a rising 2nd round pick; now, he�s a late first, IMO, headed for the St. Louis Rams.� Roc Alexander ran fast too but that won�t get him into the 1st day.� Alexander has some injury issues; that risk factor will limit him to the early 4th range.� There are character factors too, which will keep him out of Pittsburgh altogether.� Keith Millbrook of Hawaii might move up into the 4th round range; Millbrook ran sub 4.4 at 6-1, 202# and did 21 reps. Anthony Parker is another 2nd day athlete; though more likely a safety, Parker does have the size and speed to play press against those big WR entering the league.
- The raw:� Chris Gamble once was considered an elite pick but I don�t see it.� Gamble didn�t get under 4.5 in his Pro Day, even though timed on that very fast track in Columbus (where short, slow Mike Doss ran 4.4 or so last spring).� Worse, Gamble posted a Wonderlic 9; IMO, this player is dubious value at 44, let alone 11.� Joey Thomas is bigger, stronger, faster and more agile than Gamble; while he played at a low level (Montana State), he just can�t be less skilled.� The question with Thomas is whether he�s Charles Tillman (a player who could help immediately) or Drayton Florence (a downstream developmental prospect). Or Joseph Jefferson, Roosevelt Williams�� Then there�s Kevin Smith of McNeese State; Smith got high marks at the Senior Bowl; after that, he fattened to 200#, struggled to run and busted his agility drills.� However, Smith was a team leader at McNeese State, while there may be some character issues (related to confidence/arrogance or coachability) associated with Thomas.� Smith, along with Strait could be value @ 44; Thomas too (pending interview) but he may fall to 75, as did Derek Ross and William Peterson, two talents with inferable issues.� That said, considering the paucity of speed/size prospects at the position, I�m guessing both Gamble and Thomas will be going out (too) early.
- �The polished:� The pair of Will Poole and Derrick Strait once was regarded as most pro-ready, though neither were ever described as high upside types.� Of those, Poole has held value through this evaluation season but, for whatever reason, Strait has not.� Poole looks to be the 3rd CB in this class; I�d think he�d be attractive to Cover 2 contenders like Indy or Carolina.� I see Strait is a CB/FS �tweener on the order of Corey Chavous or Eugene Wilson.� Those players were drafted in the low-mid 30�s and I think Strait will be too.� Maybe earlier, for example the Eagles might use him as a 3rd CB this season while grooming him to take over for Brian Dawkins.
- Big school, big CB:� Jeremy LeSueur had a good Senior Bowl, which moved his stock from second day to second round.� However, he didn�t post a time at the Combine, and didn�t at his Pro Day either.� Speed is a question with this player, as is agility.� Marcel Almond was the 2nd corner at USC (behind Poole) but could be a better pro.� Almond showed in Indy at 209# and did 21 reps but he couldn�t run under 4.6.� However, he did have a good Pro Day, averaging less than 4.5.� Almond has played CB for about 1-� seasons; prior to that, he was a WR but his main sport was track, where he had some success in the decathlon.� He has size, strength, enough speed and agility, and good ball skills; however, there are some questions about his football toughness.� Rich Gardner of PSU is moving up steadily, as did Bryan Scott in 2003.
- The
weak and small:� Ricardo
Colclough is another CB that showed well at the Senior Bowl; however,
Colclough has been slowed by a hamstring ailment in this evaluation
season.� Additionally, he did a
Gamble-esque 11 Wonderlic and just 8 reps�� Though evidently weak and not too bright, Colclough has
some value as a developmental CB and PR; that said, those are two aspects
where the PS do have some numbers.�
Finally, both Kerwan Ratliff and Nathan Vasher ran themselves out
of the first day, posting +4.6 in the 40. That�s not good for any DB; for
small ones, it�s a ticket to football oblivion.
And the FS:
- Sean Taylor has had a tough off-season; he couldn�t get under 4.50 at the Combine; he did 12 reps there, which isn�t awful for a DB but is very poor for a 230# player; he fired off a 10 in the Wonderlic.� IMO, this prospect could fall some and be back in play at 1.11.
- Matt Ware is a quality single high FS prospect but his agility drills do not suggest much future as a CB; that Mike Williams, Reggie Williams and Rash Woods serially toasted him confirms that inference.� However, Ware is a SoCal guy; Malibu and UCLA; he could be said to be Malibu tough.
- Stuart Schweigart has all the tools: strength, speed, size and intelligence; he just won�t tackle.� That�s a disaster-in-waiting at FS, as we saw with the last double S here, Scott Shields.� IMO, Schweigart is a 4th round prospect; his prime value earlier would be if some other team took him, so pushing Matt Ware towards the Steelers� 3rd slot.
- Jason Shivers, Will Allen, Madieu Williams have little to offer that Chris Hope doesn�t provide.� The same may be said of Dexter Reid and Ettric Pruitt.
- For value at the spot, my first day DB pick is Sean Jones, R2.� If Houston gets Taylor at 1.10, Jones may come through; if not, the Texans will snap him up in R2.
- Second day sleeper:� Rashad Washington.
Afterword:
I�d encourage you to read the player profiles at NFL. com.� Skip the test results though; those are demonstrably inaccurate as we saw last spring when that site persisted in listing Sammy Davis and Dennis Weathersby as 4.6 guys when in fact they�d run 4.41 and 4.38 respectively.� That same site does a fine job tracking Pro Day results, with Gil Brandt at the controls.� Draftxchange has some free Combine results, a rare commodity today.
Next
Time:
DE and QB or maybe just O-line.