Register

Board index » Rant Forum » new poll

Non-Stiller related rants, pontifications, and soapbox lectures
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:37 pm

new poll

Postby m1k3 » Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:50 pm

Who thinks Stillers.com should dump its shitbag Windows hosting and convert to a Linux based host?

:suplusone:

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:05 am

Re: new poll

Postby rick723 » Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:11 pm

m1k3 wrote:Who thinks Stillers.com should dump its shitbag Windows hosting and convert to a Linux based host?

:suplusone:

Ya may want to find out if the webmaster knows linux before you rag him.

Seasoned Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:24 pm

Re: new poll

Postby hatethebrowns » Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:23 pm

m1k3 wrote:Who thinks Stillers.com should dump its shitbag Windows hosting and convert to a Linux based host?

:suplusone:



LINUX LINUX LINUX im a linux admin id lend a hand if asked
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward :D, 1998.

Greenhorned Rookie
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 3:30 pm

Re: new poll

Postby BoltX » Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:18 pm

:suplusone:

forget .net garbage

they can still get a decent php/MySql based package for FREE on the winblows server they have.

B. - dot.net Developer

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: new poll

Postby m1k3 » Fri Oct 02, 2009 9:50 pm

BoltX wrote::suplusone:

forget .net garbage

they can still get a decent php/MySql based package for FREE on the winblows server they have.

B. - dot.net Developer


I wasn't trying to bust balls. I've just noticed all the recent problems with the front page (i. e. how it was down pretty much all offseason).

I'm a Linux admin too that would be willing to help. I could provide server setup amd probably hosting. All we would need is a php guy.

Return to Rant Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Don't be stingy, share: