Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby Scalaid6 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:07 am

If I'm a fraud test my Steeler knowledge. I'm a fraud cause I tell the truth? PffffffT
Image

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby Scalaid6 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:09 am

And how come you cant show me where I said Byron should be the starter. I think you are the one posting fraudulent posts sir. LETS GO, TEST THIS STEELERS KNOWLEDGE AND LETS SEE WHOS A FRAUD BIG MOUTH
Image

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:03 am

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby Teegre » Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:06 am

Ben's first drive
1-10-PIT 20 B.Roethlisberger pass to 83-H.Miller for 9 yards
2-1-PIT 29 W.Parker to PIT 28 for -1 yards
3-2-PIT 28 PENALTY on PHI-58-T.Cole - No Play.
1-10-PIT 33 B.Roethlisberger pass to 10-S.Holmes for 16 yards.
1-10-PIT 49 B.Roethlisberger pass to 10-S.Holmes for 6 yards.
2-4-PHI 45 B.Roethlisberger pass incomplete
3-4-PHI 45 B.Roethlisberger pass to 86-H.Ward for 6 yards
1-10-PHI 39 W.Parker right end to PHI 40 for -1 yards
2-11-PHI 40 B.Roethlisberger pass to 85-N.Washington for 16 yards.
1-10-PHI 24 W.Parker left end to PHI 18 for 6 yards.
2-4-PHI 18 W.Parker up the middle to PHI 19 for -1 yards.
3-5-PHI 19 B.Roethlisberger pass incomplete.

Leftwich’s first drive
1-10-PIT 27 B.Leftwich pass to 85-N.Washington for 13 yards
1-10-PIT 40 B.Leftwich pass incomplete.
2-10-PIT 40 B.Leftwich pass to 83-H.Miller for 21 yards.
1-10-PHI 39 B.Leftwich pass to 83-H.Miller for 17 yards.
1-10-PHI 22 B.Leftwich pass incomplete
2-10-PHI 22 B.Leftwich pass to 85-N.Washington for 9 yards.
3-1-PHI 13 B.Leftwich sacked at PHI 22 for -9 yards.
4-10-PHI 22 B.Leftwich pass incomplete short left to 10-S.Holmes.

Seems relatively similar to me. :?:

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 12:26 pm

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby StillDodger » Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:14 am

Why don't you have Lefty in your "Steeler Nation" thingie?? If you hate Ben so much, you should be true to your beliefs. Another reason why I think you're a fraud.

And I don't GAF about your "Steeler knowledge"........ :sushootem:
Whenever Tom Brady loses, it's always someone else's fault.

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby Scalaid6 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:19 am

I dont HATE Ben. I merely want him to play up to his potential. The reason the Steelers have been held back in recent years is due to inferior play from the qb position under pressure. If you push your kids and try to make them better do you hate them? Some of you guys are ignorant and very sensitive. Its called constructive criticism. Isnt ironic that Wisenhunt said the same thing, also Cowher. The Qb has to make sound decision under pressure and when they cant the team will suffer. Again, you cant show me where I said Byron should be the starter, so I suggest you either substantiate your claims or dont engage in discourse with me sir. In regards to you thinking I'm a fraud, who cares what you think. You guys choose to criticise Arians/Tomlin and I choose to critique the one who is actually on the field.
Image

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:34 pm

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby Homer J » Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:31 pm

This post was not about starting Leftwich ahead of Ben. Not at all.

It was simply asking people why it seemed Lefty moved the team when Ben did not. And perhaps the best answer (even thought it didn't exactly answer the question) was that both moved the team in their first series.

My own thought is that Ben was so badly beaten up that he lost his effectivness in the second half. His timing was shot, his judgement was compromised. They beat the hell out of him, and by the end of the game, either Leftwich or Dixon would have been a better choice. Ben was like a boxer hanging on. He was punched out, beaten up, and no longer dangerous. He didn't quit any more than JFK quit in November, 1963. Both were murdered.

Also, Leftwich was exclusviely in the shotgun, physically sharper, and looking for the hot reads.

Grizzled Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:51 am

Re: Why was Leftwich more effective than Ben?

Postby Scalaid6 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:35 pm

And not afraid to get hit
Image

Previous

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Don't be stingy, share: