Register

Board index » Stillers Talk » The O-line - who's the boss?

Anything and everything about the Pittsburgh Steelers
Stillers.com Team
User avatar
Posts: 4583
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:21 pm

The O-line - who's the boss?

Postby thesteelhammer » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:13 pm

interesting look into what the problem may have been last year.
and of course the "pretty well set" other than at center quote.

These O-line guys need to learn how to speak to the media without saying anything.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/steelers/s_580312.html?source=rss&feed=9

With Faneca gone, Zierlein takes charge


By Mike Prisuta
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Thursday, July 31, 2008

It's not that Larry Zierlein received a promotion this offseason. His job title remains offensive line coach of the Steelers.
But with a year under his belt in that capacity and with Alan Faneca having sold his services to the New York Jets, Zierlein can actually coach the unit he oversees this season.

That's gotta help a team that surrendered 47 sacks a season ago.

"Alan's gone ... Coach Zierlein is the boss now," offensive tackle Willie Colon said upon reporting to St. Vincent College this week.


story continues below



The obvious inference was that Coach Zierlein was not the boss a year ago, a chain-of-command interpretation shared by offensive tackle Max Starks and, apparently, many among the rest of those responsible for Ben Roethlisberger's protection.
"Alan was the most tenured guy in our organization, so naturally you looked to him," Starks said. "Larry even looked to him. It was one of those things where Coach Zierlein came in and he was more like a moderator and kind of an intermediary guy. Alan was the one that kind of guided everybody.

"Now, he's gone, and it's Larry's entire offensive line."

Colon said he wasn't attempting to portray Faneca as some sort of "pirate captain."

And Starks insisted Zierlein "automatically had our respect because he was our position coach."

But in terms of actual coaching as it related to terminology and technique, Faneca, Starks said, was "kind of adamant" about still doing things the way he'd been doing them.

The veterans, thus, spoke Faneca-ese. The younger linemen listened to Zierlein's lingo. Lost in the translations at times was clarity regarding who should be blocked and how.

Now, the O-line is finally speaking what Starks defined as a "universal language," one that has "unified" and "simplified" the approach up front.

"It has nothing to do with any individual," Zierlein said. "It has to do with continuity and time.

"Alan Faneca is 100 percent pro. He did nothing but play his butt off and study. He did everything right. I think the world of the guy. I've known him for years. I recruited him (to LSU).

"Alan was the leader of the offensive line. We had a transition. There's always a transition. All I know is we were third in the league in rushing last year, and we gave up less sacks than they did the year before (49), so it's not like everything just went (downhill)."

Perhaps not, but with Faneca gone, there's reason to believe that's an inevitability this season.

Zierlein believes otherwise, and was confident enough on Wednesday to declare his starting unit "pretty well set," other than the competition at center, which will be decided between Sean Mahan and Justin Hartwig during preseason games.

Colon's a believer, too. And now that the terminology has been solved, there's no fear of a car passing by five Steelers offensive linemen and being identified as "red" by three of them and as "blue" by the other two.

"We're all gonna say it's the same color," Colon said. "Hopefully, it doesn't hit us."



Practice Squad
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:36 am

Re: The O-line - who's the boss?

Postby digitalbruiser » Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:17 pm

You think Faneca taught Zierlein how to send pornographic emails, too?

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:52 pm

Re: The O-line - who's the boss?

Postby GodfatherofSoul » Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:04 am

I called this one. I knew it was Faneca who had to be the cancer that was screwing up cohesion. I think this is why the front office was also so seemingly uninterested in getting better line picks. They figured with Faneca gone, we wouldn't have Mr. All Pro refusing to be coached.

Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:52 pm

Re: The O-line - who's the boss?

Postby GodfatherofSoul » Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:07 am

GodfatherofSoul wrote:I called this one. I knew it was Faneca who had to be the cancer that was screwing up cohesion. I think this is why the front office was also so seemingly uninterested in getting better line picks. They figured with Faneca gone, we wouldn't have Mr. All Pro refusing to be coached.


And, here's the post. Note that HiV wanted to FRANCHISE him!

Return to Stillers Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Don't be stingy, share: