The home of die hard Pittsburgh Steelers fans. It's not just a team, it's a way of life!

2003 D-side, UbU: Amendment 1

September 04, 2003 by Steel Phantom

D-side, unit by unit Update:

D-side, unit by unit Update:

 

Last night, the Steeler FO brought in Erik Flowers, cutting James Harrison to make room.So, they screwed up my unit-by-unit outlook; to make that right, I�m appending these limited comments.

 

Flowers was drafted 1.26 in 2000 by the Buffalo Bills.This was the last year of the John Butler reign although, to my recall, Tom Donahoe was already on-board in some advisory capacity.Early in the draft process, Flowers was regarded as a late 2nd thru 3rd type pick but, on the strength of a pretty good Combine, he did move up.In fact, the late great Joel Buschbaum had EF 28th among all prospects in his final summation.Anyway, here are Flowers� numbers then, along with a couple others:

 

 

H

W

40

Shuttle

Cone

Reps

KGB

6035

243

4.67

4.28

6.91

21

Clark Haggans

6033

253

5.04

4.21

7.12

20

Erik Flowers

6042

271

4.79

4.15

7.21

24

Alonzo Jackson

6040

266

4.89

4.45

7.69

16

KGB is shown here because, as discussed last winter in various prospect articles, he (with Carlos Hall) set the standard for capable package DE discoverable in the mid-rounds.The other two are current Steeler properties; it is noteworthy that: Flowers is bigger, faster and stronger than either backup.As a point of interest, his shuttle time was actually a bit faster than Brian Urlacher�s 4.18.

 

Certainly, those physical attributes must have commended Flowers to the Bills group; however, those have not translated onto the field.Here are his career stats:

 

 

Games

Starts

T

Solo

A

Sacks

INT

2000

16

0

20

14

6

2

0

2001

15

6

21

14

7

2

1

2002

14

0

1

0

1

0

0

 

The Bills were a 3-4 team in 2000 with Marcellus Wiley the featured rush DE (Note: please recall the distinction previously drawn between the Bills� and Steeler 3-4 modes).Presumably, Flowers was to have been Wiley�s heir but after that season Greg Williams brought in the Buddy Ryan 46, and that all changed.In 2001, Flowers was used as a 4-3 DE and, obviously, the results weren�t great.The numbers suggest he didn�t bring much pressure and, anecdotally, he didn�t hold up against the run either.

 

Look, the Bills drafted Aaron Schobel in 2001; they exposed Flowers to Houston in 2002 (who did take him) and they then drafted Ryan Denny in 2002.Schobel and Denny are the Bills� starting DE today; to the new regime, Flowers just wasn�t the guy.

 

He went on to do squat in Houston; listed at OLB in the Texans� Steeler-like 3-4, Flowers got nothing done, as is obvious from the stats above.So, he was a cut there and now he�s here.What�s it mean?

 

  • Flowers has good size for a package DE; maybe, he�s got a chance to help there.Given the Steelers� on-going need at that position, and given the relatively poor crop available last spring, Flowers may be some kind of upgrade

 

  • It could be argued that the Steelers got him so they�d have some experience behind OLB Gildon and Haggans.However, it is quite apparent that he doesn�t bring much there.Flowers doesn�t look like any kind of LB prospect; if he did, Dom Capers, true architect of the system here, would have kept him on in Enronburg.

 

Flowers is more prospect than player at this point and, in that respect, he�s a pretty good add. He does have good size and decent speed; for sure, he�s a better fit in the OKIE than James Harrison.Then again, Harrison looked like a better bet inside than out.Me, I�d have let Foote ride and kept JH but, given that the latter has had zero in-board exposure, that could really never have been under consideration.Now, well, we�ll see whether Harrison catches on with some team whose system better suits his ability; say, St. Louis, Tampa Bay or even Indy.I�m sorry to see Harrison go but whatever title hope the Steelers may harbor didn�t depend on their 9th LB.

 

As for Flowers, well, if he can contribute, it�ll be in a 3-down set, perhaps as outlined previously (1DL, 2 LB) but, more promisingly, in tandem with a dual DT package, as was the late John Butler�s originating intent.What are the odds?Well, not great; as Harrison was out of position at OKIE OLB so is Flowers, if for different reasons.In the best case, the FO would find prospects fully fit for the system; failing that, we�d like to see the staff adapt their system to the talent on hand.Certainly, making the 53rd guy any litmus test is overblown; such innovation or adaptation as may occur needs to act up the roster for any considerable results.Starting Sunday, you�ll have some material to evaluate there.

 

Like this? Share it with friends: